News
DGM award winners announced
The Furniture Makers’ Company announced the winners of the prestigious Design Guild Mark awards for 2016 last night at a packed ceremony at the Goldsmiths’ Centre in Clerkenwell.
Now in its ninth year, the Design Guild Mark Awards promote excellence and raise the profile of British design and innovation.
They recognise and reward designers working in Britain or British Designers working abroad. The award demands the highest standards in the design of furniture for volume production.
Nineteen designs were awarded the coveted mark:
DGM 144 – Loku Range Designed by Shin Azumi for Case Furniture
DGM 145- The Flow Chair Designed by Tomoko Azumi for Ercol
DGM 146 – Pilot Chair for Knoll Designed by Edward Barber & Jay Osgerby
DGM 147 – Column Bookcases Designed by Samuel Chan for Channels
DGM 148 – Magnus Chair Designed by Samuel Chan for Channels
DGM 149 – The Sebastian Cox Kitchen by deVOL A design collaboration between the deVOL design team and Sebastian Cox
DGM 150 – The Ashworth Desk Designed by Adam Daghorn for Conran, manufactured by Marks & Spencer
DGM 151 – Marino Chair and Sofa (pictured) Designed by Dylan Freeth for Ercol
DGM 152 – Nuno Chair Designed by Mark Gabbertas for Allermuir
DGM 153 – William Dining Chair Designed by Mark Gabbertas for Gloster
DGM 154 – Eos Range Designed by Matthew Hilton for Case Furniture
DGM 155 – Hardy Chair Designed by David Irwin for Another Country
DGM 156 – The Planks Collection Designed by Max Lamb for Benchmark
DGM 157 – Quiet Bench- hm 106 Designed by Magnus Long for Hitch Mylius
DGM 158 – hm221 Collection Designed by Timothée Mion for Hitch Mylius
DGM 159 – Kyoto Bench System Designed by Morgan Studio for Morgan
DGM 160 – UNNIA Chairs Designed by Simon Pengelly for Inclass
DGM 161 – My Ami Range Designed by Alexander White for Heals
DGM 162 – The Core Collection Designed by Jo Wilton & Mirka Grohn for &New
Alexander Gifford, Chairman of the Design Guild Mark said: “This year the criteria for the Design Guild Mark were curbed to shift emphasis onto volume production and as a result the entries reflected the higher quality of applications we had hoped for. Once again, the entries were equally diverse, from contract to retail, from residential to hospitality and workplace, as were the applicants themselves. Chairing the judging process, for the second year, was a great honour, and watching the great minds in our industry critique the great output of British design was a real pleasure.”